Policy and the evidence beast

Publicaties

Typen publicaties

Publicaties zoeken

Algemeen
Looptijd
Selecteer datum
Selecteer datum
Verstuur
A Dutch study of the expectations and practices in the area of evidence-based policy

Why is evidence-based policy sometimes so problematic in actual practice? What improvements could be made in the roles adopted by scientists and politicians? Those are the key questions addressed in this publication, which is based on interviews with people actively engaged in science, policymaking, and politics.

André Knottnerus (WRR) and Paul Huijts (Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sport) deal with health care; Henriëtte Maassen van den Brink (University of Amsterdam) and Jeroen Dijsselbloem (Socio-Democratic party) discuss education; Frank Bovenkerk (Utrecht University); and Madeleine Toorenburg (Christian-Democratic party) focus on justice. Last but not least, Daniel Sarewitz was interviewed about his much-cited article “How science makes environmental controversies worse” in Environmental Science & Policy.

Download publicatie
Naar publicatieoverzicht
Auteur:Jan Staman
Publicatiedatum:14-6-2012
Project:Evidence Based
Publicatie type:Rapport
Jaar van uitgave:2012
Plaats van uitgave:Den Haag
Uitgever:Rathenau Instituut
Aantal pagina's:48
Afdeling:Science System Assessment, Technology Assessment

Bestelinfo

Bestel een exemplaar via bestellingen(at)rathenau.nl

 

Gerelateerde publicaties

Science System Assessment, Technology Assessment
Science System Assessment, Technology Assessment
Toon meer Rathenau Instituut-publicaties (443)